Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Orzhov Lifegain | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | arianne | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
| Rakdos Reanimator | koskadelli | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-1 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 6-3 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 6-3 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | kroma_ | 6-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Doubling , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Roots , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Cauldron , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Descend , Dimir Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Deep-Cavern Bat ranks #209 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 51%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 74.5%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Deep-Cavern Bat is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 16.42 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. Deep-Cavern Bat has a win rate of 70.5%, making it 5.6% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 7 | 74.8% | 2 |
| Qarsi Revenant | Creature — Vampire | 9 | 69.6% | 2 |
| Faerie Dreamthief | Creature — Faerie Warlock | 71 | 66.0% | 10 |
| Ephara's Dispersal | Instant | 5 | 65.7% | 1 |
| Subterranean Schooner | Artifact — Vehicle | 8 | 61.6% | 1 |
| Zombify | Sorcery | 7 | 61.6% | 2 |
| Faebloom Trick | Instant | 237 | 58.0% | 50 |
| Ertai Resurrected | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Human Wizard | 332 | 57.1% | 66 |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 246 | 56.6% | 52 |
| Phantom Interference | Instant | 610 | 56.4% | 132 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Deep-Cavern Bat than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blot Out | Instant | 3 | 5 | 79.2% | 74.3% | +4.9% |
| Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 4 | 7 | 72.3% | 69.2% | +3.1% |
| Faerie Dreamthief | Creature — Faerie Warlock | 1 | 21 | 73.1% | 71.8% | +1.3% |
| Negate | Instant | 2 | 30 | 73.0% | 72.7% | +0.2% |
| Qarsi Revenant | Creature — Vampire | 3 | 9 | 67.8% | 67.8% | -0.0% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 48 | 71.9% | 72.1% | -0.2% |
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 12 | 71.2% | 71.5% | -0.3% |
| Intimidation Tactics | Sorcery | 1 | 5 | 67.6% | 68.3% | -0.6% |
| Ertai Resurrected | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Human Wizard | 4 | 40 | 69.3% | 70.0% | -0.7% |
| Phantom Interference | Instant | 1 | 49 | 69.0% | 69.9% | -0.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 672 | 32.5% | 54.2% |
| Dimir Bounce | 112 | 22.7% | 50.1% |
| Orzhov Lifegain | 75 | 96.2% | 24.7% |
| Mono Black Demons | 75 | 76.5% | 39.4% |
| Golgari Midrange | 64 | 8.2% | 30.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.